July 10, 2015 § 2 Comments
Epilogue – The comfort of my cake
July. I have not found answers.
July 10, 2015 § Leave a comment
Act III – The hybrid Here and Now
The birthday came and went, but the angst have not subsided.
Stop thinking so much about the future. Worry not about your place in the universe. Quit the futile attempt of analyzing yourself. “Here and now” I remind myself. Live the moment as it is!
But where is Here and what is in the Now? And how best to capture the moment? Suddenly I am so disoriented that even the zen attitude is challenged on the most fundamental levels.
The lifelogging exhibition still open for a few more days, my mind revisits the Science Gallery to take a look at another installation, which could be a superior method of capturing the “now”. Compared to some of the other works, it also emphasizes “caring for oneself” more than “knowing oneself”. Since the 24th September 2003, Alberto Frigo, an Italian media artist currently living in Sweden, has been photographing objects he has used with his right hand, as one of eighteen different aspects of reality he is collecting.
It has been 31 years since I inked the very first word in my journal, but my teenage self at the time gave it no forethought whatsoever about this number. Three decades in the future would have felt like the next life to her, too distant to be bothered with. Frigo’s project, on the other hand, is well planned out – it will be 36-years-long, from 2004 to 2040 when he turns 60.
July 16, 2014 § 1 Comment
The separation of science and the humanities is relatively new—and detrimental to both
By Carlo Rovelli. Excerpted from The Universe: Leading Scientists Explore the Origin, Mysteries, and Future of the Cosmos. Copyright © 2014 by Edge Foundation, Inc. Published by Harper Perennial.
We teach our students: We say that we have some theories about science. Science is about hypothetico-deductive methods; we have observations, we have data, data require organizing into theories. So then we have theories. These theories are suggested or produced from the data somehow, then checked in terms of the data. Then time passes, we have more data, theories evolve, we throw away a theory, and we find another theory that’s better, a better understanding of the data, and so on and so forth.
This is the standard idea of how science works, which implies that science is about empirical content; the true, interesting, relevant content of science is its empirical content. Since theories change, the empirical content is the solid part of what science is.
Now, there’s something disturbing, for me, as a theoretical scientist, in all this. I feel that something is missing. Something of the story is missing. I’ve been asking myself, “What is this thing missing?” I’m not sure I have the answer, but I want to present some ideas on something else that science is. « Read the rest of this entry »